Guy Blackmon
New member
Guy, is that type of side issue that big of a concern? (just being a member of another org?) How about those that are compensated by another org for speaking engagements? Or those that serve on advisory boards for another org? Those may present a conflict.
Of bigger concern may be officer candidates that are distributors. That's a definite conflict of interest. I'm not insinuating anyone has bad intentions but that was one thing we were adamant about and where the cliche of not being able to serve two masters comes into play. That includes BBS owners that accept payment for banners, anyone that distributes chems or equipment, or accepts remuneration from manufacturers. Before anyone jumps in talking about the symbiosis of contractors and distributors, I agree that both are vital for participation in the org.. just not at management/decision level.
Your feelings about the PWNA stem from the fact that many of the BOD and the key players are not just contractors. It may be wise to address that issue with the UAMCC candidates now before foul is cried later on. I interviewed with the last election committee and we talked about my distributing of RAD even though negotiations had already began for its sale. The recommendation of the committee was that running was a can of worms and contrary to the qualifications of a BOD candidate. Has that changed?
All valid points that should be addressed Ken. As to your last point, the position of the current BOD has been made clear on this many times and I will quote a BOD Members exact statement to me last night "If You Or Your Employees Get Wet, You Are A Contractor" that's what was said to me about this. Now whether we think this is right or wrong that is what I was told.
There are many changes that need to be made, but only if the Members vote for these changes.